Let's consider a manufacturing scenario where Statistical Process Control (SPC) is used to monitor and improve the quality of a production process for a specific product, such as automobile brake pads.
In this example, the critical quality characteristic of interest is the thickness of the brake pads, which must fall within a specified range to meet safety and performance requirements.
Here's how SPC can be applied to monitor and control the thickness of brake pads:
1. Data Collection: The manufacturing process involves producing brake pads of a certain thickness. Measurements of the thickness are taken periodically from samples of brake pads produced during the production run.
2. Control Chart Creation: A control chart is created to monitor the thickness of the brake pads over time. The control chart typically consists of a central line representing the process mean and upper and lower control limits based on process variability.
3. Data Analysis: As measurements are collected and plotted on the control chart, the process variability and trends are analyzed. Any points that fall outside the control limits or exhibit non-random patterns (such as trends, shifts, or cycles) are investigated as potential special causes of variation.
4. Process Adjustment: If special causes of variation are detected, corrective actions are taken to address the root cause of the issue. This could involve adjusting machine settings, changing materials or processes, or providing additional training to operators.
5. Continuous Monitoring and Improvement: The process is continuously monitored using SPC techniques to ensure that the thickness of the brake pads remains within the desired range. Regular data collection and analysis help to identify opportunities for process improvement and prevent quality issues from recurring.
By using Statistical Process Control in this example, the manufacturer can ensure that the thickness of brake pads meets quality standards consistently, leading to improved product performance, customer satisfaction, and cost savings through reduced rework and scrap.
give me real world example for special cause variation in Stastical process control
Here are some real-world examples of special cause variation in Statistical Process Control (SPC):
Few other examples
- A machine breaks down unexpectedly, causing a spike in cycle time or defect rate[1][2][3]
- A shipment of raw materials is contaminated, leading to an increase in product failures[1][2][4]
- A power outage shuts down production for several hours, disrupting the normal process[2][3]
- A new operator makes a mistake in a critical process step, resulting in off-spec product[1][3]
- An earthquake or severe weather event damages equipment and facilities[2][4]
Special causes are unexpected, non-routine events that are not part of the normal process variation. They are assignable to a specific cause and can be corrected by adjusting the process. When special causes occur, they will show up as points outside the control limits or non-random patterns on a control chart[1][4].
The key is to quickly identify the special cause, determine the root source, and implement corrective action to bring the process back into a state of statistical control[1][3]. Preventing special causes requires proactive measures like preventive maintenance, operator training, and supplier quality audits[3].
Citations:
[1] The Power of Special Cause Variation: Learning from Process Changes https://www.isixsigma.com/dictionary/special-cause-variation/
[2] Common Cause Variation Vs. Special Cause Variation - Simplilearn.com https://www.simplilearn.com/common-vs-special-cause-of-variance-article
[3] Common and Special Causes in Statistical Process Control - LinkedIn https://www.linkedin.com/advice/0/what-some-common-tools-techniques-identifying
[4] How to Identify Causes of Variation in Statistical Process Control https://safetychain.com/blog/identifying-variation-statistical-process-control
[5] Common cause and special cause (statistics) - Wikipedia https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Common_cause_and_special_cause_%28statistics%29
No comments:
Post a Comment